Daniel Hauser is “THE BRAVE”, But he does not live in “THE LAND OF THE FREE”

Daniel’s story is truly an outrage. Here is a family committed to a form of treatment for cancer, and they are being ordered by the Government to do a treatment that they consider harmful and dangerous! What should be an issue that the family decided and acted on together has now become a nationwide manhunt for a mother and her child.

The righteous say that the life of the 13-year-old son is at stake. The family, including the 13-year-old, say that his life is at stake if he does conventional chemo. So who is right?

Is it really who is right, or is it who has the right? Usually, a child is governed and guided by his parents, unless it is determined that the parents are harming the child. In this case, the government and the conventional medical community seem to feel that the parents would be harming the child by not giving him conventional chemo. However, the child is in agreement with his parents that he does not want conventional chemo.

Daniel has decided that he does not want to undergo the ravages of conventional chemo - to his body and his quality-of-life. It has been proven that conventional chemo damages the vital body organs, the immune system, the P53 tumor suppressor gene, and distorts the DNA of healthy cells. Read what the American Cancer Society has to say about side effects of chemo:  click here

Just because conventional chemo is conventional wisdom does not mean it is the only wisdom. All alternatives are not quackery. Webster’s says that an alternative is ‘offering a choice; different from the usual’. There are many solid and viable alternative cancer therapies; many of them are not part of mainstream medicine because they do not represent a big enough return for the pharmaceutical companies or the scientific institutions to go through the financial investment to test them. Insulin Potentiation Targeted LowDose (IPTLD™) is one of them. www.IPTLD.com.  IPTLD™ is still considered “experimental”, even though it has been used successfully on cancer and chronic disease since 1946! Yes, this targeted therapy, which uses FDA-approved drugs, is an “alternative therapy” because the pharmaceutical companies won’t invest the money to properly test it.

Many people feel forced to take conventional chemo instead of IPTLD™, because that is all their insurance will cover (insurance won’t cover experimental therapies). Daniel Hauser is truly being forced against his will to take conventional, even though he would prefer the option of a targeted therapy which would be tough on the cancer but gentle to him. Would it make sense to you to be forced to do something that you knew would be harmful and painful, when you could do something that would let you continue to lead a fairly normal life – looking good and feeling good, while the cancer died?

What happened to The Land of the Free? Why shouldn’t Daniel Hauser be able to decide how he wants to live and/or how he wants to die?

Respectfully submitted,

Annie Brandt

Presidential Founder, Executive Director

The Elka Best Foundation