From the Natural News e-newsletter 7.28.10

Socially Active Environment Can Cause Cancer Tumors to Shrink and Even Disappear

(NaturalNews) If you or someone you know ever receives a cancer diagnosis, especially one that is labeled “incurable” or fatal, take heart in the fact spontaneous regression (remission) has been reported in the medical literature numerous times for virtually all cancers. Spontaneous regression has been documented most often in neuroblastoma, renal cell carcinoma, lymphoma and malignant melanoma. And, as NaturalNews has previous reported, scientists have also discovered recently that some invasive breast cancers appear to simply go away on their own (http://www.naturalnews.com/024901.html). Now comes research from Ohio State University that could help explain what triggers spontaneous remissions.

The new study, published in the July 9th issues of the journal Cell found that when mice with cancer were given enriched living conditions and a boost in their social life, their tumors shrank — and some of their cancers disappeared completely. That’s powerful evidence, the scientists say, that social connections and an individual’s mental state, play an important role in the way the body responds to malignancies. “Animals’ interaction with the environment has a profound influence on the growth of cancer — more than we knew was possible,” Matthew During, who headed the study, said in a statement to the press.

The lab rodents were originally housed in groups of about five, given all the food they wanted and allowed to play all day. However, for the research project, mice with cancer were placed in an even better, enriched environment. They had bigger living groups with 15 to 20 other animals to interact with. They also had more space and extra toys, hiding places and running wheels.

During and his colleague, Lei Cao, found that malignant tumors in animals living in this enriched environment started to shrink. In fact, tumors decreased by an impressive 77 percent in mass and decreased in volume by 43 percent, the researchers report. Moreover, five percent of mice with cancer showed no evidence of the disease at all after just three weeks of living in their new home. That seemingly spontaneous cancer cure never happened in control animals kept in standard housing.

So what specifically is going on here that impacts cancer? Animals in a regular mice environment in the lab who exercised more didn’t experience improvements in their cancer, so the scientists say more exercise isn’t the total explanation. Instead, they think the complex social dimension in the new living arrangement was apparently the key.

The enriched living environment appears to have sparked more, but apparently cancer-fighting, stress in the cancer-stricken mice. The animals showed higher levels of stress hormones called glucocorticoids. What this means, the researchers said in statement to the media, is that low levels of stress, or certain kinds of stress, are probably beneficial.

“A lot of people think stress is bad, but our data show the animals aren’t just happy. Antidepressants won’t give you the same effect,” the scientists said in the press statement. “The goal isn’t to minimize stress, but to live a richer life, socially and physically. You want to be challenged.”

In addition, the rodents had lower levels of a hormone produced by fat called leptin, indicative of a significant shift in metabolism. Their immune systems also appeared to be “ramped up a bit,” During said.

During and his colleague pinned down an increase in a growth factor expressed in the hypothalamus called brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the mice living in the improved mouse environment. Further study revealed that manipulations designed to increase BDNF levels also reduced tumor burden. If animals lacked BDNF, the benefits of an enriched environment were not apparent.

The findings could ultimately lead to advances in the way cancer and other diseases are treated — perhaps through environmental modifications that offer mental and social stimulation. “We’re really showing that you can’t look at a disease like cancer in isolation,” During said in the media statement. “For too long, physicians and others have stuck to what they know — surgery, chemo, radiotherapy. Traditionally working on the area of lifestyle and the brain has been a ’soft area’. This paper really suggests if we look at people more in terms of their perceptions of disease, their social interactions and environment, we could realize a profound influence on cancer…”

For more information:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/…
http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/co…
http://yalepress.typepad.com/fighti…
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Sp…

LIVING AFTER CANCER

I just read the Parade insert in the Dallas Morning News while I was visiting Dallas on Monday, 6/21/10. It featured an article “Living After Cancer”, and it dealt with the side-effects of conventional cancer therapy and how they affected post-treatment life. All of this is very alien to those of us who have gone through IPT (IPTLD), as there are little or no side-effects with this kind, gentle, yet effective targeted lowdose chemotherapy.

Just in case you are unfamiliar, too, here is some information on the side-effects they reported.
• Fatigue: can persist in survivors for years
• Pain: neuropathic pain can be caused by some forms of chemotherapy. Radiation and surgery may also leave the patient with scar tissue, leading to painful tightening of the skin’s surface or internal adhesions.
• Cognitive impairment: A most common complaint during and after treatment is “chemo brain”.
• Infertility and sexual dysfunction: Cancer treatment can leave many patients infertile or reporting sexual dysfunction.
• Depression and anxiety: “cancer may leave your body, but it never leaves your mind”.
• Other cancers: 25% of survivors end up having multiple cancers, entirely different cancers from the original. To me, this makes perfect sense when you consider that conventional therapy (surgery, chemo, radiation) has been proven to:
o Weaken the immune system
o Damage vital body organs
o Destroy the P53 tumor-suppressor gene
o Stimulate the cancer
o Cause the cancer to build immunities against the treatments
After all of that, how could the body and the immune system prevent cancer from returning in as many ways as possible?

That is what Best Answer for Cancer is all about: getting the information out about different options that patients have for their care. We believe the best answer for cancer is A solid holistic and integrated platform of healing and strengthening components (mind/body, spirituality, diet/nutrition, detox, immune system boosting, lifestyle and exercise) that supports and strengthens the patient’s body to further increase the effectiveness of a targeted cancer therapy. Our targeted therapy of choice is Insulin Potentiation Targeted LowDose Therapy (IPTLD).

Lori speaks about her first IPT/IPTLD treatment

Dear Friends,
I just wanted to thank you all for praying for me last week and let you know it went awesome!
I absolutely love my new dr. and I am very excited about the comprehensive plan that he has put together for me.
I had my first IPT treatment on Thursday and it went great. It is an interesting process - they gave me insulin to drop my blood sugar way down and when it got to 34, they cranked in the low dose chemo drugs and made me eat and drink right away. I felt a little light headed and hot, but the dr.
stayed with me the whole time and made sure I was ok and after about an hour I felt great. I have been on pain medication around the clock for the last couple of weeks and I was actually able to skip it entirely that afternoon because I felt so good, and since then I’ve only been taking about half as much. That is remarkable to me after just one treatment!

Help Us Help Others

What is the Best Answer for Cancer?

The Elka Best Foundation has recently been renamed the Best Answer for Cancer™ Foundation. What do we mean by the best answer for cancer? We at the Foundation believe that the best answer for cancer is: An integrated holistic program of healing modalities that supports and strengthens the body and the immune system. This platform in turn supports a targeted cancer therapy: our targeted therapy of choice is

IPTLD™. To read more about IPTLD™, go to www.IPTLD.com.

Daniel Hauser is “THE BRAVE”, But he does not live in “THE LAND OF THE FREE”

Daniel’s story is truly an outrage. Here is a family committed to a form of treatment for cancer, and they are being ordered by the Government to do a treatment that they consider harmful and dangerous! What should be an issue that the family decided and acted on together has now become a nationwide manhunt for a mother and her child.

The righteous say that the life of the 13-year-old son is at stake. The family, including the 13-year-old, say that his life is at stake if he does conventional chemo. So who is right?

Is it really who is right, or is it who has the right? Usually, a child is governed and guided by his parents, unless it is determined that the parents are harming the child. In this case, the government and the conventional medical community seem to feel that the parents would be harming the child by not giving him conventional chemo. However, the child is in agreement with his parents that he does not want conventional chemo.

Daniel has decided that he does not want to undergo the ravages of conventional chemo - to his body and his quality-of-life. It has been proven that conventional chemo damages the vital body organs, the immune system, the P53 tumor suppressor gene, and distorts the DNA of healthy cells. Read what the American Cancer Society has to say about side effects of chemo:  click here

Just because conventional chemo is conventional wisdom does not mean it is the only wisdom. All alternatives are not quackery. Webster’s says that an alternative is ‘offering a choice; different from the usual’. There are many solid and viable alternative cancer therapies; many of them are not part of mainstream medicine because they do not represent a big enough return for the pharmaceutical companies or the scientific institutions to go through the financial investment to test them. Insulin Potentiation Targeted LowDose (IPTLD™) is one of them. www.IPTLD.com IPTLD™ is still considered “experimental”, even though it has been used successfully on cancer and chronic disease since 1946! Yes, this targeted therapy, which uses FDA-approved drugs, is an “alternative therapy” because the pharmaceutical companies won’t invest the money to properly test it.

Many people feel forced to take conventional chemo instead of IPTLD™, because that is all their insurance will cover (insurance won’t cover experimental therapies). Daniel Hauser is truly being forced against his will to take conventional, even though he would prefer the option of a targeted therapy which would be tough on the cancer but gentle to him. Would it make sense to you to be forced to do something that you knew would be harmful and painful, when you could do something that would let you continue to lead a fairly normal life – looking good and feeling good, while the cancer died?

What happened to The Land of the Free? Why shouldn’t Daniel Hauser be able to decide how he wants to live and/or how he wants to die?

Respectfully submitted,

Annie Brandt

Presidential Founder, Executive Director

The Elka Best Foundation

Elka Best is a force for IPT

Greetings, Guests.  I am Dr. Richard Linchitz and am an active IPT/IPTLD provider, trainer and member of the Elka Best Foundation Medical Advisory Board.

I encourage you to view the information about Elka Best and IPT/IPTLD to learn more.  http://www.elkabest.org, http://www.iptforcancer.com.  These Sites were developed by EBF to inform and assist patients and survivors.  They include historical and treatment information about IPTLD and allow you to see a list of certified providers.

EBF, with the guidance of the Medical Advisory Board headed by Dr. Donato Perez Garcia, maintain strict standards of compentence and training.  I do recommend, if you choose IPTLD, to select a provider listed on http://www.iptforcancer.com

If you’d like to see a video presentation, I’ve created one that you may find helpful.   Feel free to view it at http://www.linchitzipt.com or on YouTube.

I look forward to beginning a dialog with you.

Yours in health.

Rick.

Physician Discussion

We invite certified providers to contribute to our BLOG.  Please contact lamae@elkabest.org for you login information.

Patients - Please Join

We are anxious to have regular patient contributors to the blog.  If you would like to join as an author, please contact Annie@ElkaBest.org.

Welcome

Welcome to the Elka Best Foundation BLOG!

Elka Best Foundation Blog is another Dream Warrior Production -- Powered by WordPress